I observed three
teachers and discussed how they treat content vocabulary and checking for
comprehension with their students. All of the teachers I’ve observed teach
vocabulary in context. During his talk, Jamie stopped to define difficult or
challenging words. He first he repeated the word/term and asks for volunteers
to explain what they thought the word meant. Then, he confirmed, corrected, or
added to what the students shared as their previous knowledge and
comprehension.
Like Jaime, the
other teachers I observed used read-aloud, shared reading, and think-aloud—modeling
how they comprehend what they read and strategies for defining and using words.
Teachers additionally had students read independently, out loud, and for
information gathering. All of the assessments (formal and informal) create a
picture in the teacher’s mind of each student’s comprehension and vocabulary.
In the language
acquisition class I observed, the teacher defines academic English with English
learners in the following process.
1.
Teacher reads the purpose
2.
Teacher identifies a difficult academic word
from the sentence
3.
Students say the word chorally
4.
Teacher asks for a definition of the word and
chooses from volunteers until the word is defined correctly.
5.
Students write the definition or synonym under
the academic term
6.
Students list more synonyms for related academic
words and has the students select one they will use in a sentence
7.
Teacher reads the sentence frame
8.
Students chorally read the sentence frame
9.
Students fill in missing words from sentence
frame with the word they selected to use in a sentence.
10. Students rewrite the sentence frame as a complete
sentence
11. Students
partner, share their sentences, and write each other’s responses, then tell-back
what they heard
12. Everyone
discusses their sentences as a group
In English
literature and composition, students need to know the technical language of short
story and novel reading and writing: plot (exposition, rising action, climax,
falling action, and denouement), conflict (man against man, man against nature,
man against machine, and man against self), character (protagonist, antagonist,
and narrator), point of view (first-person, second-person, third-person
omniscient or close), voice, style, and setting. Also, essay writing terms
(thesis statement, introduction, and conclusion—not to mention all of the text
structures). These terms are found in the language arts standards for high
school students and are industry words used in education and professional study
and demonstrations of literature and composition.
Before reading the
text, I define comprehension as being able to understand something to the point
that you can use it with mastery and explain it correctly (in multiple ways) to
someone else. Before reading the text, I decided that I currently teach and
reinforce literary and writing terms and elements by asking students to connect
to prior knowledge, define, discuss, interact with, identify, and give examples
of terms.
I took the Metacognitive
Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory from the article, From Practice
to Preaching: Helping Content Area Teachers Teach Comprehension. My scores were high for global (57, 4.4 mean), problem-solving (36, 4.5 mean), and support strategies (32, 3.5
mean).
The overall
average 4.13 indicates that I use reading strategies when reading academic
materials. I use global strategies most often; therefore, I could consider
using the lower-scoring (underused) support strategies of reading aloud to
myself, read slowly and carefully, adjusting reading speed, using a dictionary,
and going back and forth in a text to find relationships. I noticed that some
of my underused reading strategies are the strategies I use highly in editing.
After reading the
text, the implications for my own teaching greatly expanded. Initially, I
wasn’t sure why my co-teacher used read aloud and shared reading more than having
the students read the text out loud, popcorn, or chorally. Now, I better
understand the value and trend with read aloud and shared reading. However, in my observation, the teacher read
the much more than one to three paragraphs of the most interesting text. It
seems a good method would be to start the students off with read aloud or
shared reading, and then move to group, pair, or individual work so that
students can practice using the strategies they just saw modeled.
Which ideas
suggested in these chapters am I most likely to apply in your own teaching? The
easier question to answer is which ideas am I the least likely to apply! There
were so many excellent examples. I appreciate learning and being reminded of
the many strategies available to me as I teach vocabulary and comprehension. I
plan to apply the following, among others.
·
Make copies of the text books for students to
annotate as they read
·
Explicitly model, think aloud, and discuss reading
strategies—possibly have the students take their own reading strategy inventory.
Display the strategies in the classroom. Give students a reference.
·
Explicitly model, think aloud, and discuss, and
give multiple examples of reading comprehension strategies. Display the
strategies in the classroom (pp. 63-64 and 69). Give students a reference.
·
DR-TA to plan reading-thinking activity planning
(pg. 68)
·
4-Square vocabulary cards
·
Total physical response (pg. 48), semantic
feature analysis (pg. 47), Vocabulary Jeopardy (avoid overuse), and structural
word analysis (pg. 44)
·
Help students be actively involved in word
learning, make personal connections, be immersed in vocabulary, and consolidate
meaning through multiple information sources
·
Vocabulary self-awareness (pg. 41)
References:
Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2011). Improving
Adolescent Literacy: Strategies at Work. Pearson, Merrill, Prentice Hall:
Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Mari Beth Bennett (September 2003). From Practice to Preaching:
Helping Content Area Teachers Teach Comprehension. Voices from the Middle, Volume 11, Number 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment